Musladin v. Black

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Musladin v. Black

87 S.E. 69, 102 S.C. 544, 1915 S.C. LEXIS 235

Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided December 7, 1915·No. 9244·Published

Opinion

The following order was made

Per Curiam.

This is an application for a writ of certiorari to require the city Democratic executive committee of Charleston to certify to this Court the proceedings had before them in the matter of'the recent Democratric primary for the city of Charleston to nominate a mayor and aider-men for said city.

It appears from the return of the respondents filed herein that they have not now the possession of the proceedings; that they have filed the same with the clerk of the Court for Charleston county, as provided by law, and they would now be unable to comply with the writ, if issued.

This return is not traversed’. Under the case of State v. Moore, 54 S. C. 556, 32 S. E. 700, the writ is refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The following order was made

Per Curiam.

This is an application for a writ of certiorari to require the city Democratic executive committee of Charleston to certify to this Court the proceedings had before them in the matter of'the recent Democratric primary for the city of Charleston to nominate a mayor and aider-men for said city.

It appears from the return of the respondents filed herein that they have not now the possession of the proceedings; that they have filed the same with the clerk of the Court for Charleston county, as provided by law, and they would now be unable to comply with the writ, if issued.

This return is not traversed’. Under the case of State v. Moore, 54 S. C. 556, 32 S. E. 700, the writ is refused.

Musladin v. Black, 87 S.E. 69, 102 S.C. 544, 1915 S.C. LEXIS 235 (S.C. 1915).

Pincite

87 S.E. 69 (Musladin v. Black) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related