Muskingum Watershed Conservancy District v. Clow

11 N.E.2d 876, 133 Ohio St. 61, 133 Ohio St. (N.S.) 61, 10 Ohio Op. 64, 1937 Ohio LEXIS 179
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 20, 1937
Docket26590
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 11 N.E.2d 876 (Muskingum Watershed Conservancy District v. Clow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Muskingum Watershed Conservancy District v. Clow, 11 N.E.2d 876, 133 Ohio St. 61, 133 Ohio St. (N.S.) 61, 10 Ohio Op. 64, 1937 Ohio LEXIS 179 (Ohio 1937).

Opinion

It is ordered and adjudged that said appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

Appeal dismissed.

Weygandt, C. J., Matthias, Zimmerman, Williams, Myers and Gorman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hostetter v. Muskingum Watershed Conservancy District
16 N.E.2d 428 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 N.E.2d 876, 133 Ohio St. 61, 133 Ohio St. (N.S.) 61, 10 Ohio Op. 64, 1937 Ohio LEXIS 179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/muskingum-watershed-conservancy-district-v-clow-ohio-1937.