Muskat v. Highlands Insurance Co.

654 So. 2d 1290, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5754, 1995 WL 322578
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 31, 1995·No. No. 94-2521·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Citizens Ins. Co. v. Barnes, 98 Fla. 933, 124 So. 722 (Fla.1929); State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Metropolitan Dade County, 639 So.2d 63 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 649 So.2d 234 (Fla.1994); Reliance Ins. Co. v. Harris, 503 So.2d 1321 (Fla. 1st DCA), review denied, 513 So.2d 1063 (Fla.1987); Regency Baptist Temple v. Insurance Co. of N. Am., 352 So.2d 1242 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977); Netherlands Ins. Co. v. Fowler, 181 So.2d 692 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Muskat v. Highlands Insurance Co., 654 So. 2d 1290, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5754, 1995 WL 322578 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

654 So. 2d 1290 (Muskat v. Highlands Insurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Netherlands Insurance Company v. Fowler
181 So. 2d 692 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)
State Farm v. Metropolitan Dade County
639 So. 2d 63 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Reliance Ins. Co. v. Harris
503 So. 2d 1321 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Regency Baptist Temple v. Ins. Co. of North America
352 So. 2d 1242 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)
Citizens Insurance v. Barnes
124 So. 722 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1929)