MUSIC ROYALTY CONSULTING, INC. v. WILLIAM RUDOLPH MCLEAN

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

MUSIC ROYALTY CONSULTING, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 6:22-cv-2110-RBD-DCI

WILLIAM RUDOLPH MCLEAN,

Defendant. ____________________________________

ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for attorney fees. (Doc. 185.) On referral, U.S. Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick entered a Report and Recommendation submitting that the Court should deny the motion. (Doc. 192 (“R&R”).) The time has passed and the parties did not object, so the Court examines the R&R for clear error only. See Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 F. App’x 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006). Finding none, the R&R is due to be adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. The R&R (Doc. 192) is ADOPTED, CONFIRMED, and made a part of this Order in its entirety. 2. Plaintiff’s motion (Doc. 185) is DENIED. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Orlando, Florida, on May 12, 2026. United States District Judge