Music Plus v. Baker

125 Cal. App. 3d 819, 178 Cal. Rptr. 415, 1981 Cal. App. LEXIS 2366
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedNovember 18, 1981
DocketCiv. 59841
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 125 Cal. App. 3d 819 (Music Plus v. Baker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Music Plus v. Baker, 125 Cal. App. 3d 819, 178 Cal. Rptr. 415, 1981 Cal. App. LEXIS 2366 (Cal. Ct. App. 1981).

Opinion

Opinion

ASHBY, J.

The City of Glendale appeals from a judgment declaring that Glendale Ordinance No. 4439 is unconstitutional and permanently enjoining its enforcement.

The ordinance in question regulates the display to minors of drug paraphernalia for sale. In pertinent part it states: “No owner, manager, proprietor, or other person in charge of any room in any place of business selling or displaying for the purpose of sale any device, contrivance, instrument or paraphernalia designed principally or which may be used for smoking or injecting or consuming marijuana, hashish, PCP or any controlled substance as defined in the Health and Safety Code of the State of California (other than prescription drugs and devices to ingest or inject prescription drugs) including but not limited to roach clips, and cigarette papers and rollers designed or commonly used for smoking of the foregoing, shall allow or permit any person under the age of eighteen (18) years to be in, remain in, enter or visit such room unless such minor person is accompanied by one of his parents or his legal guardian.” (Art. IV, § 11-80.) 1

The trial court held the ordinance unenforceable in its entirety upon the ground that it violates due process of law by being impermissibly vague.

In Music Plus Four, Inc. v. Barnet (1980) 114 Cal.App.3d 113, 125-129 [170 Cal.Rptr. 419], the court held that an essentially similar ordinance of the City of Westminster was not void for vagueness.

A minor difference between the Glendale ordinance and the ordinance upheld in Barnet is that whereas the Westminster ordinance refers to paraphernalia “for smoking or injecting” and roach clips, cigarette papers and rollers “designed for the smoking” of certain substances, the Glendale ordinance refers to paraphernalia “designed *821 principally or which may be used for smoking or injecting” and roach clips, cigarette papers and rollers “designed or commonly used for smoking” of the substances. (Italics added.)

This difference in language is insignificant when the statute is interpreted to include a knowledge requirement, as was done in Barnet. (Id., at p. 128.)

Respondent also contends that the injunction may be upheld on the alternative grounds that the ordinance impermissibly infringes upon speech protected by the First Amendment and violates due process because it is not rationally designed or reasonably related to achieving a permissible state purpose. These arguments were also rejected in Bar-net. (Id., at pp. 129-132.) The Barnet court also rejected arguments based upon equal protection and preemption by state law. (Id., at pp. 129-132.) The Supreme Court denied hearing. For all the reasons indicated in Barnet, we find the Glendale ordinance constitutional.

The judgment is reversed.

Stephens, Acting P. J., and Hastings, J., concurred.

Respondent’s petition for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied January 13, 1982. Kaus, J., did not participate therein.

*822 APPENDIX

"ORDINANCE NO. *43»

"AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE ADDING ARTICLE IV TO CHAPTER 11 OF THE GLENDALE MUNICIPAL CODE, 1964, RELATING TO EXCLUSION OF MINORS FROM ANY ROOM OR PLACE OF BUSINESS WHERE DEVICES, CONTRIVANCES, INSTRUMENTS OR PARAPHERNALIA FOR THE SMOKING OR INJECTION OF MARIJUANA, HASHISH, PCP, OR ANY CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE IS DISPLAYED OR OFFERED POR SALE, AND PROHIBITING THE GIFT, SALE OR DELIVERY OF SUCH DEVICES TO MINORS.

"BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE:

"SECTION 1. Article IV is hereby added to Chapter XI of the Glendale Municipal Code 1964, by adding thereto the following:
"ARTICLE XV. Section 11-80.
"Sec. 11-80. Sale and display of narcotic and other oaraoherna11a—Minors.
"No owner, manager, proprietor, or other person in charge of any room in any place of business selling or displaying for the purpose of sale any device, contrivance, instrument or paraphernalia designed principally or which may be used for smoking or injecting or consuming marijuana, hashish, PCP or any controlled substance as defined in the Health and Safety Code of the State of California (other than prescription drugs and devices to ingest or inject prescription drugs) including but not limited to roach clips, and cigarette papers and rollers designed or commonly used for smoking of the foregoing, shall allow or permit any person under the age of eighteen (18) years to be in, remain in, enter or visit such room unless such minor person is accompanied by one of hie parents or his legal guardian. "Sec. 11-81. Persons excluded—Minors.
" A person under the age of eighteen (18) years *823 •hall not be in, remain in, enter or visit any room in any place of business used for the sale or displaying for sale, device, contrivance, instrument or paraphernalia designed principally or which may be used for smoking, Injecting, or consuming marijuana, hashish, PCP, or any controlled substance (other than prescription drugs and devices to ingest or inject prescription drugs) including but not limited to roach clips, end cigarette papers and rollers designed or commonly used for smoking the foregoing, unless such person is accompanied by one of his parents or his legal guardian.
" Pec. 11-82. Sale and display rooms.
"A person shall not maintain in any place of business to which the public is Invited, a display for sale, or the offer to sell therein, any device, contrivance, instrument or paraphernalia designed principally or which may be used for smoking, injecting, or consuming marijuana, hashish, PCP, or any controlled substance (other than prescription drugs and devices to ingest or inject prescription drugs) including but not limited to roach clips, end
cigarette papers and rollers designed or commonly used for smoking the foregoing, unless such devices, contrivances, instruments or paraphernalia are maintained within a separate room to which minors not accompanied by a parent or legal guardian are excluded. Each entrance to such room shall be sign-posted in reasonably visible end legible words to the effect that persons under the age of eighteen (18) years are prohibited from entering such room unless such minor is accompanied by one of his parents or his legal guardian.
*824 "Sec. 11-83. Saw--Nuisance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bamboo Brothers v. Carpenter
133 Cal. App. 3d 116 (California Court of Appeal, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
125 Cal. App. 3d 819, 178 Cal. Rptr. 415, 1981 Cal. App. LEXIS 2366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/music-plus-v-baker-calctapp-1981.