Musgrove v. Nash
3 Edw. Ch. 172, 1837 N.Y. LEXIS 260, 1837 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 22
Opinion
said, that as the rights of these defendants had not been finally passed-upon and proof might be taken to disprove their answers, the money must remain in the hands of the receiver until hearing and decree. It would then be paid over to the proper person. Also, that the receiver could not be compelled, in the middle of a suit, to account to a party. He is only to account to the court, under the rules ; and which are so definite that he cannot escape such accounting. He is the officer of the court and not of the party. Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Musgrove v. Nash, 3 Edw. Ch. 172, 1837 N.Y. LEXIS 260, 1837 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 22 (N.Y. 1837).
3 Edw. Ch. 172 (Musgrove v. Nash) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Higgins v. Wright
43 Barb. 461 (New York Supreme Court, 1864)