Musgrove v. Lusk

Tennessee Supreme Court

Musgrove v. Lusk

64 Tenn. 684

DecidedDecember 15, 1875

StatusPublished

This text of 64 Tenn. 684 (Musgrove v. Lusk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Musgrove v. Lusk, 64 Tenn. 684 (Tenn. 1875).

Pincite

Opinion

Deaderick, Ch. J.,

delivered the opinion of the ■court.

This is a motion to dismiss the appeal of Martha and Florence Bilbo, because the pauper’s oath is made not by them, but by their guardian ad. litem, who swears that according to his information and belief, that by reason of their poverty they are" unable to bear the expenses of the appeal, etc. This affidavit does not authorize the appeal—3 Sneed, 131, ib. 203, and the motion must be allowed. .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Deaderick, Ch. J.,

delivered the opinion of the ■court.

This is a motion to dismiss the appeal of Martha and Florence Bilbo, because the pauper’s oath is made not by them, but by their guardian ad. litem, who swears that according to his information and belief, that by reason of their poverty they are" unable to bear the expenses of the appeal, etc. This affidavit does not authorize the appeal—3 Sneed, 131, ib. 203, and the motion must be allowed. .

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

64 Tenn. 684, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/musgrove-v-lusk-tenn-1875.