Musetto v. City of Miami Beach

82 So. 2d 595
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided September 28, 1955·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

TERRELL, Justice.

The record and the briefs in this case have been examined and we think the judgment appealed from should be affirmed on authority of City of Miami Beach v. Quinn, 149 Fla. 326, 5 So.2d 593; Kitchen v. City of Jacksonville, 158 Fla. 621, 29 So.2d 441; City of Fort Lauderdale v. Duchine, Fla.1954, 70 So.2d 897; and Dramstadt v. City of West Palm Beach, Fla.1955, 81 So.2d 484.

All of these cases, like the case at bar, attempt'to fasten negligence on the municipality for injury tó persons stepping in depressions or stumbling over water meter boxes in grass plots or parkways that are provided and maintained to beautify the city and add to its aesthetic. quality. Whether “Keep off the grass” warnings are up or not, their very nature may be a notice to pedestrians to avoid them and the cited cases admonish them to keep off. Might as well attempt to produce a grass plot or a parkway in a horse lot as in an area where, -pedestrians tramp wi.th impunity.

Affirmed.,

DREW, C. J., ROBERTS, J., and . ALLEN, Associate Justice, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Musetto v. City of Miami Beach, 82 So. 2d 595 (Fla. 1955).

82 So. 2d 595 (Musetto v. City of Miami Beach) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Naylor v. Citrus County Board of Commissioners
730 So. 2d 1292 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
City of Pensacola v. Stamm
448 So. 2d 39 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Collom v. City of St. Petersburg
400 So. 2d 507 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Runowich v. City of St. Petersburg
276 So. 2d 83 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1973)