Muse v. Muse

76 Miss. 372
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided November 15, 1898·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Woods, C. if.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

We have no statute which confers upon the nearest of kin of an adjudged lunatic the legal right to have the guardianship of the lunatic. The cases cited by counsel for appellant involved the legal right of the nearest of kin to have the guardianship of a minor. In such cases the law conferred the right upon the nearest of kin to guardianship of the minor. But we have no such statute as to the appointment of guardians of the person or estate of insane persons. The power of appointment in such case is confided to the discretion of the chancery court, and, in the case before us, that discretion appears to have been wisely exercised.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Muse v. Muse, 76 Miss. 372 (Mich. 1898).

76 Miss. 372 (Muse v. Muse) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cole v. Burt
1960 OK 45 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1960)
Barney v. Barney
33 So. 2d 823 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1948)
Smith v. Muse
103 So. 356 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1925)