Muse v. Meeker

82 P. 1134, 72 Kan. 702, 1905 Kan. LEXIS 410
CourtSupreme Court of Kansas
DecidedDecember 9, 1905
DocketNo. 14,343
StatusPublished

This text of 82 P. 1134 (Muse v. Meeker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Muse v. Meeker, 82 P. 1134, 72 Kan. 702, 1905 Kan. LEXIS 410 (kan 1905).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The only question argued in this case by the plaintiff in error is that there was an absolute want of any testimony to support the judgment in the court below. With this contention we cannot agree. There is not only substantial but sufficient evidence found in the record to support the conclusions and judgment of the court. For this reason the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
82 P. 1134, 72 Kan. 702, 1905 Kan. LEXIS 410, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/muse-v-meeker-kan-1905.