Muse v. Jones

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Muse v. Jones

108 S.E. 837, 27 Ga. App. 489, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 226

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 7, 1921

Docket12553

StatusPublished

This text of 108 S.E. 837 (Muse v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Muse v. Jones, 108 S.E. 837, 27 Ga. App. 489, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 226 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

Hill, J.

This was a suit for commissions alleged to be due on the sale of an automobile. The suit was filed in a justice’s court, where a verdict was rendered for the plaintiff, and an appeal was taken to the superior court, where a verdict was again rendered for the plaintiff. The evidence was conflicting and the sole question is a question of fact. There was sufficient evidence to authorize the verdict, and this verdict has the approval of the trial judge.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill, J.

This was a suit for commissions alleged to be due on the sale of an automobile. The suit was filed in a justice’s court, where a verdict was rendered for the plaintiff, and an appeal was taken to the superior court, where a verdict was again rendered for the plaintiff. The evidence was conflicting and the sole question is a question of fact. There was sufficient evidence to authorize the verdict, and this verdict has the approval of the trial judge.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

108 S.E. 837, 27 Ga. App. 489, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/muse-v-jones-gactapp-1921.