Muscle v. Podracky

527 A.2d 1390, 108 N.J. 176, 1987 N.J. LEXIS 1747
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided June 9, 1987·Published

Opinion

Petition for certification granted; the judgment of the Appellate Division is summarily reversed, and the matter is remanded to the Middletown Township Zoning Board of Adjustment for further consideration and articulation, based on the existing record, of whether the proofs in the record adequately demonstrate “special reasons” within the meaning of Kohl v. Mayor of Fair Lawn, 50 N.J. 268 (1967). See Medici v. BPR Company, 107 N.J. 1, 14-19 (1987).

Jurisdiction is not retained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Muscle v. Podracky, 527 A.2d 1390, 108 N.J. 176, 1987 N.J. LEXIS 1747 (N.J. 1987).

527 A.2d 1390 (Muscle v. Podracky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Medici v. BPR Co.
526 A.2d 109 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1987)
Kohl v. Mayor and Council of Borough of Fair Lawn
234 A.2d 385 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1967)