Muscle v. Podracky
This text of 527 A.2d 1390 (Muscle v. Podracky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for certification granted; the judgment of the Appellate Division is summarily reversed, and the matter is remanded to the Middletown Township Zoning Board of Adjustment for further consideration and articulation, based on the existing record, of whether the proofs in the record adequately demonstrate “special reasons” within the meaning of Kohl v. Mayor of Fair Lawn, 50 N.J. 268 (1967). See Medici v. BPR Company, 107 N.J. 1, 14-19 (1987).
Jurisdiction is not retained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
527 A.2d 1390, 108 N.J. 176, 1987 N.J. LEXIS 1747, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/muscle-v-podracky-nj-1987.