Muscle Shoals Const. Co. v. Little
This text of 106 So. 132 (Muscle Shoals Const. Co. v. Little) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Muscle Shoals Construction Company, a partnership, as garnishee, confessed judgment in the case of Little v. Humphries. At a later day of the term the garnishee moved the court to set aside the judgment and permit it to file an answer denying indebtedness to the defendant in the original suit. This motion, having been regularly continued, was overruled at the next term, and the garnishee now seeks to bring that action under review by appeal.
By its motion, garnishee invoked the common-law power of the court during the term to set aside its judgments on account of accident or surprise which ordinary prudence could not have guarded against. Code, § 9518. It would be a matter of no difficulty to demonstrate that appellant’s predicament is to be attributed to its own very obvious lack of ordinary diligence in making the agreement in pursuance of which judgment against it was rendered. But we cannot get to that, for no appeal lies from a judgment overruling a motion to set aside a judgment by confession. Baggett v. Alabama Chemical Co., 156 Ala. 637, 47 So. 102.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
106 So. 132, 213 Ala. 662, 1925 Ala. LEXIS 475, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/muscle-shoals-const-co-v-little-ala-1925.