Home/Appellate Court of Illinois/Muschelewicz v. Kamradt

Muschelewicz v. Kamradt

207 Ill. App. 138
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedJuly 2, 1917
DocketGen. No. 23,029
StatusPublished

This text of 207 Ill. App. 138 (Muschelewicz v. Kamradt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Muschelewicz v. Kamradt, 207 Ill. App. 138 (Ill. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Dever

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. 1. Mandamus, § 1* — when writ of, toill not issue. A writ of mandamus will not issue where the party seeking such writ has not proved his right thereto by clear and satisfactory evidence. 2. Municipal corporations, § 146* — when illegality of appointment precludes recovery of compensation. Where a city attorney illegally appoints a person to spread assessments even though such appointment is ratified by the city, there is no legal contract existing under which there can be a recovery for any specific sum for services rendered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
207 Ill. App. 138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/muschelewicz-v-kamradt-illappct-1917.