Muscarello v. Muscarello

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Muscarello v. Muscarello

52 A.D.2d 932, 383 N.Y.S.2d 87, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12795

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 18, 1976

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 52 A.D.2d 932 (Muscarello v. Muscarello) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Muscarello v. Muscarello, 52 A.D.2d 932, 383 N.Y.S.2d 87, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12795 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

In a matrimonial action, the defendant husband appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated October 20, 1975, which (1) granted the plaintiff wife’s motion for (a) temporary alimony and (b) exclusive possession of the marital home and (2) denied his cross motion for a sale of the marital premises. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. Since the trial in the instant action is scheduled to commence May 24, 1976, the trial court is in the best position to determine the financial needs of the wife in relation to the husband’s ability to pay and to make a proper disposition with respect to the marital home. A speedy trial is the best solution to this matrimonial dispute. Gulotta, P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello, Latham and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a matrimonial action, the defendant husband appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated October 20, 1975, which (1) granted the plaintiff wife’s motion for (a) temporary alimony and (b) exclusive possession of the marital home and (2) denied his cross motion for a sale of the marital premises. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. Since the trial in the instant action is scheduled to commence May 24, 1976, the trial court is in the best position to determine the financial needs of the wife in relation to the husband’s ability to pay and to make a proper disposition with respect to the marital home. A speedy trial is the best solution to this matrimonial dispute. Gulotta, P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello, Latham and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

52 A.D.2d 932, 383 N.Y.S.2d 87, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12795, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/muscarello-v-muscarello-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack