Musaelian v. Adams

169 P.3d 882, 67 Cal. Rptr. 3d 460
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 10, 2007
DocketS156045
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 169 P.3d 882 (Musaelian v. Adams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Musaelian v. Adams, 169 P.3d 882, 67 Cal. Rptr. 3d 460 (Cal. 2007).

Opinion

67 Cal.Rptr.3d 460 (2007)
169 P.3d 882

MUSAELIAN
v.
ADAMS.

No. S156045.

Supreme Court of California.

October 10, 2007.

Prior report: Cal.App., 63 Cal.Rptr.3d 603.

The petition for review is granted.

The issue to be briefed and argued is limited to the following: Whether an attorney who is appearing in propria persona is entitled to attorney fees as a sanction under Code of Civil Procedure section 128.7.

GEORGE, C.J., KENNARD, BAXTER, WERDEGAR, CHIN, MORENO and CORRIGAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Nguyen
169 P.3d 882 (California Supreme Court, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
169 P.3d 882, 67 Cal. Rptr. 3d 460, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/musaelian-v-adams-cal-2007.