Musacchia v. Hyde

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Musacchia v. Hyde

562 So. 2d 449, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4606, 1990 WL 88097

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 26, 1990

DocketNo. 89-2745

StatusPublished

This text of 562 So. 2d 449 (Musacchia v. Hyde) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Musacchia v. Hyde, 562 So. 2d 449, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4606, 1990 WL 88097 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

There is no abuse of discretion in the order on review granting the appellees a new trial after a jury verdict for the plaintiffs-appellants, see Smith v. Brown, 525 So.2d 868 (Fla.1988); Cloud v. Fallis, 110 So.2d 669 (Fla.1959), and it is therefore affirmed. This action is taken without prejudice to reconsideration of the appellants’ motion to amend pleadings and for further discovery. The ground upon which the motion was previously denied, untimeliness, is no longer pertinent in view of the order requiring a new trial, which we have now affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

There is no abuse of discretion in the order on review granting the appellees a new trial after a jury verdict for the plaintiffs-appellants, see Smith v. Brown, 525 So.2d 868 (Fla.1988); Cloud v. Fallis, 110 So.2d 669 (Fla.1959), and it is therefore affirmed. This action is taken without prejudice to reconsideration of the appellants’ motion to amend pleadings and for further discovery. The ground upon which the motion was previously denied, untimeliness, is no longer pertinent in view of the order requiring a new trial, which we have now affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

562 So. 2d 449, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4606, 1990 WL 88097, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/musacchia-v-hyde-fladistctapp-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack