Musa-Bey v. Dunn

583 F. App'x 52
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 2, 2014
DocketNo. 14-1635
StatusPublished

This text of 583 F. App'x 52 (Musa-Bey v. Dunn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Musa-Bey v. Dunn, 583 F. App'x 52 (4th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mansa Musa-Bey appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Musa-Bey’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Musa-Bey has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
583 F. App'x 52, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/musa-bey-v-dunn-ca4-2014.