Murvin v. State
This text of 393 So. 2d 657 (Murvin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Murvin asserts that the trial court erred in refusing to classify her as a youthful offender as provided in Section 958.04(2), Florida Statutes (Supp.1978). The offense, however, took place prior to the effective date of the statute. Since the statute cannot be retroactively applied, the trial court’s imposition of sentence is AFFIRMED. Bradley v. State, 385 So.2d 1122 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980); Allen v. State, 383 So.2d 674 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); State v. Pizarro, rev’d on reh., 383 So.2d 762 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
393 So. 2d 657, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19455, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murvin-v-state-fladistctapp-1981.