Murvin v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Murvin v. State

393 So. 2d 657, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19455

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 11, 1981·No. No. TT-273·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Murvin asserts that the trial court erred in refusing to classify her as a youthful offender as provided in Section 958.04(2), Florida Statutes (Supp.1978). The offense, however, took place prior to the effective date of the statute. Since the statute cannot be retroactively applied, the trial court’s imposition of sentence is AFFIRMED. Bradley v. State, 385 So.2d 1122 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980); Allen v. State, 383 So.2d 674 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); State v. Pizarro, rev’d on reh., 383 So.2d 762 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980).

MILLS, C. J., and BOOTH and LARRY G. SMITH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Murvin asserts that the trial court erred in refusing to classify her as a youthful offender as provided in Section 958.04(2), Florida Statutes (Supp.1978). The offense, however, took place prior to the effective date of the statute. Since the statute cannot be retroactively applied, the trial court’s imposition of sentence is AFFIRMED. Bradley v. State, 385 So.2d 1122 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980); Allen v. State, 383 So.2d 674 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); State v. Pizarro, rev’d on reh., 383 So.2d 762 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980).

MILLS, C. J., and BOOTH and LARRY G. SMITH, JJ., concur.

Murvin v. State, 393 So. 2d 657, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19455 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

393 So. 2d 657 (Murvin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related