Murungi v. United States of America Department of Veterans Affairs
Opinion
SUMMARY ORDER
UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be, and it hereby is, AFFIRMED.
On September 21, 2001, Theodore Kan-tor, attorney for the appellant, moved to adjourn oral argument. Seeing no issue that requires argument, we elect to take this case on submission.
Defendant James H. Murungi challenges Judge Larimer’s February 8, 2001 Decision dismissing petitioner’s Title VII claim. We affirm for substantially the reasons stated in Judge Larimer’s thorough and well reasoned opinion. See Murungi v. United States of America Dep’t of Veterans Affairs, 136 F.Supp.2d 154 (W.D.N.Y. 2001).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
20 F. App'x 63 (Murungi v. United States of America Department of Veterans Affairs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.