Murto v. Lemon

19 Colo. App. 313
CourtColorado Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 15, 1903
DocketNo. 2319
StatusPublished

This text of 19 Colo. App. 313 (Murto v. Lemon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Colorado Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Murto v. Lemon, 19 Colo. App. 313 (Colo. Ct. App. 1903).

Opinion

Gunter, J.

This was an action by appellant to recover a personal judgment against appellee, Laura J. Lemon, upon promissory notes executed by her, and to foreclose a trust deed given as security. The court gave personal judgment for the amount due upon the notes, but refused foreclosure of the trust deed, bolding the same to have been released. The judgment was one in favor of appellant, and, being so, we are without jurisdiction to review it upon appeal, our judgment would be a nullity. — Lockhaven Trust and Safe Deposit v. U. S. Mortgage and Trust Company et al., ante, p. 28, 73 Pac. 409.

As permitted by sec. 388, Mills’’Ann. Code, the clerk will enter the action as pending on error. — D. & R. G. R. R. Co. v. Peterson, 30 Colo. 77, 69 Pac. 578.

Appeal dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Denver & Rio Grande Railroad v. Peterson
30 Colo. 77 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1902)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 Colo. App. 313, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murto-v-lemon-coloctapp-1903.