Murto v. Lemon

19 Colo. App. 313
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Murto v. Lemon. Read the opinion of the Court — 19 Colo. App. 314
Colorado Court of Appeals·Decided September 15, 1903·No. No. 2319·Published

Opinion

Gunter, J.

This was an action by appellant to recover a personal judgment against appellee, Laura J. Lemon, upon promissory notes executed by her, and to foreclose a trust deed given as security. The court gave personal judgment for the amount due upon the notes, but refused foreclosure of the trust deed, bolding the same to have been released. The judgment was one in favor of appellant, and, being so, we are without jurisdiction to review it upon appeal, our judgment would be a nullity. — Lockhaven Trust and Safe Deposit v. U. S. Mortgage and Trust Company et al., ante, p. 28, 73 Pac. 409.

As permitted by sec. 388, Mills’’Ann. Code, the clerk will enter the action as pending on error. — D. & R. G. R. R. Co. v. Peterson, 30 Colo. 77, 69 Pac. 578.

Appeal dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Murto v. Lemon, 19 Colo. App. 313 (Colo. Ct. App. 1903).

19 Colo. App. 313 (Murto v. Lemon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Denver & Rio Grande Railroad v. Peterson
30 Colo. 77 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1902)