Murtha v. Union Hospital Ass'n

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Murtha v. Union Hospital Ass'n

22 A.D.2d 665, 253 N.Y.S.2d 521, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3013

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 22, 1964

StatusPublished

This text of 22 A.D.2d 665 (Murtha v. Union Hospital Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Murtha v. Union Hospital Ass'n, 22 A.D.2d 665, 253 N.Y.S.2d 521, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3013 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, entered May 12, 1964, permitting defendant McGrath to serve a supplemental answer, including a cross claim based on an alleged right of common-law indemnity against defendant hospital, unanimously affirmed, with $30 costs and disbursements to defendant-respondent against defendants-appellants. (See Braun v. City of New York, 17 A D 2d 264; 2 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N. Y. Civ. Prac., pars. 1007.02, 1401.03.) Concur — Breitel, J. P., Valente, Stevens, Eager and Bastow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, entered May 12, 1964, permitting defendant McGrath to serve a supplemental answer, including a cross claim based on an alleged right of common-law indemnity against defendant hospital, unanimously affirmed, with $30 costs and disbursements to defendant-respondent against defendants-appellants. (See Braun v. City of New York, 17 A D 2d 264; 2 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N. Y. Civ. Prac., pars. 1007.02, 1401.03.) Concur — Breitel, J. P., Valente, Stevens, Eager and Bastow, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 A.D.2d 665, 253 N.Y.S.2d 521, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3013, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murtha-v-union-hospital-assn-nyappdiv-1964.