Murtha v. New York Homeopathic Medical College & Flower Hospital
126 N.E. 915, 228 N.Y. 551, 1920 N.Y. LEXIS 1009
This text of 126 N.E. 915 (Murtha v. New York Homeopathic Medical College & Flower Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Murtha v. New York Homeopathic Medical College & Flower Hospital, 126 N.E. 915, 228 N.Y. 551, 1920 N.Y. LEXIS 1009 (N.Y. 1920).
Opinion
*552 Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion of Cabdozo, J., in Murtha v. Homeopathic Medical College & Flower Hospital (228 N. Y. 183).
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Cabdozo, Pound, Cbane and Andrews, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Murtha v. New York Homeopathic Medical College & Flower Hospital
126 N.E. 722 (New York Court of Appeals, 1920)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
126 N.E. 915, 228 N.Y. 551, 1920 N.Y. LEXIS 1009, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murtha-v-new-york-homeopathic-medical-college-flower-hospital-ny-1920.