Murtagh v. Allen Motor Lines, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Murtagh v. Allen Motor Lines, Inc.

283 A.D. 804, 128 N.Y.S.2d 598, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5377

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 8, 1954

StatusPublished

This text of 283 A.D. 804 (Murtagh v. Allen Motor Lines, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Murtagh v. Allen Motor Lines, Inc., 283 A.D. 804, 128 N.Y.S.2d 598, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5377 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from an order removing action No. 2 from New York County and consolidating it with action No. 1 in Kings County and from an order granting reargument and adhering to the original determination. Order on reargument modified by striking from the ordering paragraph everything which follows the words “ upon reargument ” and by substituting therefor a provision denying the motion for consolidation, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Appeal from original order dismissed, without costs. The nonresident plaintiff in action No. 2 was not entitled to the benefit of the preference accorded the plaintiffs in action No. 1, nor could the court consolidate action No. 2 with action No. 1 when it affirmatively appeared that the latter had been settled and discontinued prior to the making of the order of transfer and consolidation. Nolan, P. J., MaeCrate, Schmidt, Beldoek and Murphy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from an order removing action No. 2 from New York County and consolidating it with action No. 1 in Kings County and from an order granting reargument and adhering to the original determination. Order on reargument modified by striking from the ordering paragraph everything which follows the words “ upon reargument ” and by substituting therefor a provision denying the motion for consolidation, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Appeal from original order dismissed, without costs. The nonresident plaintiff in action No. 2 was not entitled to the benefit of the preference accorded the plaintiffs in action No. 1, nor could the court consolidate action No. 2 with action No. 1 when it affirmatively appeared that the latter had been settled and discontinued prior to the making of the order of transfer and consolidation. Nolan, P. J., MaeCrate, Schmidt, Beldoek and Murphy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

283 A.D. 804, 128 N.Y.S.2d 598, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5377, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murtagh-v-allen-motor-lines-inc-nyappdiv-1954.