Murrysville Watch, Pet v. Mun of Murrysville
This text of Murrysville Watch, Pet v. Mun of Murrysville (Murrysville Watch, Pet v. Mun of Murrysville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
MURRYSVILLE WATCH COMMITTEE, : No. 56 WAL 2022 : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the v. : Commonwealth Court : : MUNICIPALITY OF MURRYSVILLE : ZONING HEARING BOARD AND : MUNICIPALITY OF MURRYSVILLE : v. : : : OLYMPUS ENERGY LLC : v. : : : DAVID AND CINDY GESUALE, DOUGLAS : AND DAVID GEIGER, BARRY AND : PAMELA PAULISICK, FREE GOSPEL : CHURCH, INC., DORIS AND JURGEN : EKBERT, AND SAMUEL AND REGINA : STAYMATES, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 10th day of August, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Murrysville Watch, Pet v. Mun of Murrysville, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murrysville-watch-pet-v-mun-of-murrysville-pa-2022.