Murry v. Yuchasz
730 N.W.2d 737, 478 Mich. 851
Opinion
Jimmie L. MURRY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
B.J. YUCHASZ and Jill Kulhanek, Defendants-Appellants, and
Jane Doe, Defendant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
*738 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 31, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MARKMAN, J., would grant leave to appeal to consider the Court of Appeals dissent.
MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH, J., not participating, due to a familial relationship with counsel of record.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Murry v. Yuchasz, 730 N.W.2d 737, 478 Mich. 851 (Mich. 2007).
730 N.W.2d 737 (Murry v. Yuchasz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jordan v. DEPT. OF LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH
738 N.W.2d 703 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2007)