Murry v. Yuchasz
This text of 730 N.W.2d 737 (Murry v. Yuchasz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Jimmie L. MURRY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
B.J. YUCHASZ and Jill Kulhanek, Defendants-Appellants, and
Jane Doe, Defendant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
*738 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 31, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MARKMAN, J., would grant leave to appeal to consider the Court of Appeals dissent.
MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH, J., not participating, due to a familial relationship with counsel of record.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
730 N.W.2d 737, 478 Mich. 851, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murry-v-yuchasz-mich-2007.