Murry v. Mills

Nebraska Supreme Court

Murry v. Mills

1 Neb. 456

CourtNebraska Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 1, 1871

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 1 Neb. 456 (Murry v. Mills) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Murry v. Mills, 1 Neb. 456 (Neb. 1871).

Pincite

Opinion

[459]*459The court,

by Kellogg, Ch. J.,

held that the provision of the Code above quoted was, by the section- in the chapter on arbitrations above quoted, made applicable to the report of the arbitrators, and that such report must, to have any validity to support a judgment, state the facts found by the arbitrators and their conclusions of law thereon separately. As this report does not conform to this requirement of the statute it must be set aside. The motion for judgment was rightly overruled, and the .exceptions filed by Mills to the report were rightly sustained. • The judgment must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[459]*459The court,

by Kellogg, Ch. J.,

held that the provision of the Code above quoted was, by the section- in the chapter on arbitrations above quoted, made applicable to the report of the arbitrators, and that such report must, to have any validity to support a judgment, state the facts found by the arbitrators and their conclusions of law thereon separately. As this report does not conform to this requirement of the statute it must be set aside. The motion for judgment was rightly overruled, and the .exceptions filed by Mills to the report were rightly sustained. • The judgment must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Neb. 456, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murry-v-mills-neb-1871.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack