Murry v. Mills

1 Neb. 456
Nebraska Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1871·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

[459]*459The court,

by Kellogg, Ch. J.,

held that the provision of the Code above quoted was, by the section- in the chapter on arbitrations above quoted, made applicable to the report of the arbitrators, and that such report must, to have any validity to support a judgment, state the facts found by the arbitrators and their conclusions of law thereon separately. As this report does not conform to this requirement of the statute it must be set aside. The motion for judgment was rightly overruled, and the .exceptions filed by Mills to the report were rightly sustained. • The judgment must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Murry v. Mills, 1 Neb. 456 (Neb. 1871).

1 Neb. 456 (Murry v. Mills) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of O'Neill v. Clark
78 N.W. 256 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1899)
Burkland v. Johnson
70 N.W. 388 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1897)
Westover v. Armstrong
24 Neb. 391 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1888)
Graves v. Scoville
17 Neb. 593 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1885)