Murry v. Daughtry

133 P. 1070, 18 N.M. 44
CourtNew Mexico Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 9, 1913
DocketNo. 1506
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 133 P. 1070 (Murry v. Daughtry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Mexico Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Murry v. Daughtry, 133 P. 1070, 18 N.M. 44 (N.M. 1913).

Opinion

OPINION OP THE COURT.

HANNA, J. —

There are two. motions, for our consideration, for the dismissal of the appeal, raising substantially the same questions. The grounds assigned in support of the motion for a dismissal as to the appellant, Clara Murry, are all incorporated in the motion for' dismissal as to the appellant, Sarah Jane Murry, which, however, incorporates additional grounds. Neither of these motions are supported by brief or argument.

We are disposed to believe that motions not deemed worthy of argument are so lightly considered by the party presenting same, that our time should not be consumed by an investigation into their merits.

For the reasons stated the motions are overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wyoming Wool Marketing Ass'n v. Woodruff
372 P.2d 174 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1962)
Blanchard v. Elmer Wood Co.
214 N.W. 583 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1927)
Wm. D. Cleveland & Sons v. Jamison
182 S.W. 1175 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1916)
Koshland v. Weber
148 P. 369 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
133 P. 1070, 18 N.M. 44, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murry-v-daughtry-nm-1913.