Murry v. City of Fayetteville
207 F. App'x 345
Opinion
Elaine Murry appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1982 and 2000d (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Murry v. City of Fayetteville, No. 5:05-CV-861-BR (E.D.N.C. Aug. 17, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Murry v. City of Fayetteville, 207 F. App'x 345 (4th Cir. 2006).
207 F. App'x 345 (Murry v. City of Fayetteville) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Property rights of citizens
42 U.S.C. § 1982
§ 2000d
42 U.S.C. § 2000d