Murrin v. Murrin

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Murrin v. Murrin

549 So. 2d 823, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2377, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5553, 1989 WL 118633

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 11, 1989

DocketNo. 88-3413

StatusPublished

This text of 549 So. 2d 823 (Murrin v. Murrin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Murrin v. Murrin, 549 So. 2d 823, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2377, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5553, 1989 WL 118633 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

REVERSED. We agree with appellant that the trial court erred in not making provision for her to receive some amount of permanent periodic alimony. The record contains undisputed evidence establishing the appellant’s genuine need for continuing support and the appellee’s ability to provide help to her.

Although we find no error with respect to the other aspects of the trial court’s decisions, we remand this cause without prejudice to the trial court’s authority to reconsider those decisions in light of our direction on the permanent alimony issue. The dissolution of marriage is affirmed. Upon remand the trial court is free to conduct further evidentiary hearings or to enter an amended final judgment in accord herewith upon a consideration of the existing record.

ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

REVERSED. We agree with appellant that the trial court erred in not making provision for her to receive some amount of permanent periodic alimony. The record contains undisputed evidence establishing the appellant’s genuine need for continuing support and the appellee’s ability to provide help to her.

Although we find no error with respect to the other aspects of the trial court’s decisions, we remand this cause without prejudice to the trial court’s authority to reconsider those decisions in light of our direction on the permanent alimony issue. The dissolution of marriage is affirmed. Upon remand the trial court is free to conduct further evidentiary hearings or to enter an amended final judgment in accord herewith upon a consideration of the existing record.

ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

549 So. 2d 823, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2377, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5553, 1989 WL 118633, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murrin-v-murrin-fladistctapp-1989.