Murrilla v. Guis

107 P. 378, 57 Wash. 564
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 3, 1910
DocketNo. 7483
StatusPublished

This text of 107 P. 378 (Murrilla v. Guis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Murrilla v. Guis, 107 P. 378, 57 Wash. 564 (Wash. 1910).

Opinions

Rudkin, C. J.

(concurring) —Whether the testimony shows a technical seduction may well be doubted, but it tends to show an actionable wrong sufficiently covered by the allegations of the complaint, and I therefore concur in the judgment.

Morris and Gose, JJ., concur for the reason stated by Rudkin, C. J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Coella
28 P. 28 (Washington Supreme Court, 1891)
Murrilla v. Guis
98 P. 100 (Washington Supreme Court, 1908)
Breon v. Henkle
13 P. 289 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1887)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
107 P. 378, 57 Wash. 564, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murrilla-v-guis-wash-1910.