Murrell v. Ficklin

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Murrell v. Ficklin

521 So. 2d 1161, 1988 La. LEXIS 986, 1988 WL 24792

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMarch 25, 1988

DocketNo. 88-CC-0356

StatusPublished

This text of 521 So. 2d 1161 (Murrell v. Ficklin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Murrell v. Ficklin, 521 So. 2d 1161, 1988 La. LEXIS 986, 1988 WL 24792 (La. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Ficklin, Emory, Individ.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, supervisory and/or remedial writs; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CW87 1847; Parish of Assumption, 23rd Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 39169.

Writ granted. The judgment of the court of appeal is reversed to the extent that it dismissed the third party petition of Emory Ficklin against State Farm Fire & Casualty Company. The judgment of the trial court denying State Farm summary judgment as to the third party demand is reinstated. Plaintiffs did not seek review of the court of appeal’s ruling that State Farm is entitled to summary judgment against them, so that portion of the court of appeal’s judgment is not disturbed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Ficklin, Emory, Individ.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, supervisory and/or remedial writs; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CW87 1847; Parish of Assumption, 23rd Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 39169.

Writ granted. The judgment of the court of appeal is reversed to the extent that it dismissed the third party petition of Emory Ficklin against State Farm Fire & Casualty Company. The judgment of the trial court denying State Farm summary judgment as to the third party demand is reinstated. Plaintiffs did not seek review of the court of appeal’s ruling that State Farm is entitled to summary judgment against them, so that portion of the court of appeal’s judgment is not disturbed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

521 So. 2d 1161, 1988 La. LEXIS 986, 1988 WL 24792, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murrell-v-ficklin-la-1988.