Murray v. Weston
51 N.Y.S. 1006, 23 A.D. 623
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 31, 1897·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the opinion of' the special term. All concur, except CULLEN and HATCH, JJ., dissenting, who are of the opinion that the sale of intoxicating liquors should also be restrained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Murray v. Weston, 51 N.Y.S. 1006, 23 A.D. 623 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1897).
51 N.Y.S. 1006 (Murray v. Weston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kew Gardens Corp. v. Ciro's Plaza, Inc.
175 Misc. 475 (New York Supreme Court, 1940)
de Lima v. Mitchell
49 Misc. 171 (New York Supreme Court, 1906)
Solomon v. Buffalo Railway Co.
96 A.D. 487 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1904)
Freeman v. Brooklyn Heights RailRoad
87 A.D. 127 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903)