Murray v. Villa Barone Ristorante, Inc.

2017 NY Slip Op 1783, 148 A.D.3d 458, 49 N.Y.S.3d 119
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 9, 2017·No. 3346·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Mary Ann Brigantti, *459 J.), entered on or about October 11, 2016, which, inter alia, denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendants’ motion for summary judgment was properly denied in this action where plaintiff Mary Murray was injured when she fell while ascending the stairs in defendants’ restaurant. Plaintiff testified that as she attempted to move her foot to the next step, it came in contact with the front lip of the second step, and contrary to defendants’ assertion, plaintiff also testified that she had to bend down to grab the handrail, which was low. This evidence, as well as the affidavit of plaintiffs’ expert engineer, who opined that the low positioning of the handrails and the higher position of the step risers were in violation of various New York City Building Codes, sufficiently raised triable issues as to whether the riser height of the stairs and low handrail were proximate causes of plaintiff’s injuries (see Lievano v Browning School, 265 AD2d 233 [1st Dept 1999]).

We have considered defendants’ remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

Concur — Sweeny, J.P., Mazzarelli, Moskowitz and Kahn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Murray v. Villa Barone Ristorante, Inc., 2017 NY Slip Op 1783, 148 A.D.3d 458, 49 N.Y.S.3d 119 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

2017 NY Slip Op 1783 (Murray v. Villa Barone Ristorante, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Barreto v. Grote St. Apts., L.P.
2022 NY Slip Op 00003 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)