Murray v. Univ. of N.C. at Chapel Hill
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA No. 124A16
Filed 9 June 2017
JILLIAN MURRAY
v.
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL
Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C. App. ___, 782 S.E.2d 531 (2016), dismissing an appeal from an order entered on 6 November 2014 by Judge Carl R. Fox in Superior Court, Orange County, and remanding the case for further proceedings. On 9 June 2016, the Supreme Court allowed defendant’s petition for discretionary review as to an additional issue. Heard in the Supreme Court on 21 March 2017.
Law Firm of Henry Clay Turner, PLLC, by Henry Clay Turner, for plaintiffappellee .
Joshua H. Stein, Attorney General, by Elizabeth A. Fisher, Assistant Solicitor General, and Laura Howard McHenry, Assistant Attorney General, for defendant-appellant.
PER CURIAM.
As to the appeal of right based on the dissenting opinion, we affirm the majority decision of the Court of Appeals. We conclude that the petition for discretionary review as to the additional issue was improvidently allowed.
AFFIRMED; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Murray v. Univ. of N.C. at Chapel Hill (Murray v. Univ. of N.C. at Chapel Hill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.