Murray v. United States
This text of Murray v. United States (Murray v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6661
LENZIE LEE MURRAY, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-01- 2188-AMD)
Submitted: July 25, 2002 Decided: August 1, 2002
Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lenzie Lee Murray, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Richard Charles Kay, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Lenzie Lee Murray, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders
denying his motion for return of property pursuant to Fed. R. Crim.
P. 41(e) and motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and
the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Murray v. United States, No. CA-01-2188-AMD (D. Md. filed Feb. 13,
2002 & entered Feb. 14, 2002; filed Feb. 19, 2002 & entered Feb.
20, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Murray v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murray-v-united-states-ca4-2002.