Murray v. United States

Second Circuit

Murray v. United States

273 F. 522, 1921 U.S. App. LEXIS 1509

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedApril 27, 1921

DocketNo. 223

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 273 F. 522 (Murray v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Murray v. United States, 273 F. 522, 1921 U.S. App. LEXIS 1509 (2d Cir. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order of Judge Garvin, under section 1014, U. S. Revised Statutes (Comp. St. § 1674), removing the defendants to the Eastern district of North Carolina for trial under an indictment charging them with conspiring to commit an offense against the United States.

If the order is to be regarded as a step in the cause, it is interlocutory, and therefore not appealable, under section 128 of the Judicial Code (Comp. St. § 1120). Coastwise Lumber & Supply Co. v. United States, 259 Fed. 847, 170 C. C. A. 647. If it is to be regarded as an independent proceeding, the only relief is, and by long-established practice has been, by writ of habeas corpus. This is concededly the first proceeding by appeal of which there is any knowledge.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order of Judge Garvin, under section 1014, U. S. Revised Statutes (Comp. St. § 1674), removing the defendants to the Eastern district of North Carolina for trial under an indictment charging them with conspiring to commit an offense against the United States.

If the order is to be regarded as a step in the cause, it is interlocutory, and therefore not appealable, under section 128 of the Judicial Code (Comp. St. § 1120). Coastwise Lumber & Supply Co. v. United States, 259 Fed. 847, 170 C. C. A. 647. If it is to be regarded as an independent proceeding, the only relief is, and by long-established practice has been, by writ of habeas corpus. This is concededly the first proceeding by appeal of which there is any knowledge.

Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

273 F. 522, 1921 U.S. App. LEXIS 1509, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murray-v-united-states-ca2-1921.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack