Murray v. Trustees of Retirement Plan for Employees of Nassau Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Murray v. Trustees of Retirement Plan for Employees of Nassau Hospital

51 A.D.2d 581, 378 N.Y.S.2d 1011, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10874

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 26, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 51 A.D.2d 581 (Murray v. Trustees of Retirement Plan for Employees of Nassau Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Murray v. Trustees of Retirement Plan for Employees of Nassau Hospital, 51 A.D.2d 581, 378 N.Y.S.2d 1011, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10874 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to declare plaintiff’s rights in a certain retirement plan, plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated April 29, 1975, as, upon reargument, (1) set aside a prior order of the same court, dated January 23, 1975, (2) granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment, and (3) declared plaintiff’s rights under the retirement plan to be limited, to the return of funds contributed by him, with accrued interest. Order [582]*582affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements. Assuming all of plaintiff’s allegations to be true, no prima facie case was established. Gulotta, P. J., Latham, Hargett, Damiami and Christ, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to declare plaintiff’s rights in a certain retirement plan, plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated April 29, 1975, as, upon reargument, (1) set aside a prior order of the same court, dated January 23, 1975, (2) granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment, and (3) declared plaintiff’s rights under the retirement plan to be limited, to the return of funds contributed by him, with accrued interest. Order [582]*582affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements. Assuming all of plaintiff’s allegations to be true, no prima facie case was established. Gulotta, P. J., Latham, Hargett, Damiami and Christ, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 A.D.2d 581, 378 N.Y.S.2d 1011, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10874, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murray-v-trustees-of-retirement-plan-for-employees-of-nassau-hospital-nyappdiv-1976.