Murray v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Murray v. State

290 S.W.3d 144, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1062, 2009 WL 2144097

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 21, 2009

DocketWD 68499

StatusPublished

This text of 290 S.W.3d 144 (Murray v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Murray v. State, 290 S.W.3d 144, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1062, 2009 WL 2144097 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jeffrey Murray appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. Murray contends that the trial court clearly erred in denying his motion as his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to relay a plea offer to him, introducing evidence that opened the door to prejudicial adverse evidence, and failing to object to the admission of certain evidence. Upon a review of the record, this court affirms the motion court’s decision. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jeffrey Murray appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. Murray contends that the trial court clearly erred in denying his motion as his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to relay a plea offer to him, introducing evidence that opened the door to prejudicial adverse evidence, and failing to object to the admission of certain evidence. Upon a review of the record, this court affirms the motion court’s decision. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

290 S.W.3d 144, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1062, 2009 WL 2144097, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murray-v-state-moctapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack