Murray v. State
290 S.W.3d 144, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1062, 2009 WL 2144097
Opinion
ORDER
Jeffrey Murray appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. Murray contends that the trial court clearly erred in denying his motion as his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to relay a plea offer to him, introducing evidence that opened the door to prejudicial adverse evidence, and failing to object to the admission of certain evidence. Upon a review of the record, this court affirms the motion court’s decision. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Murray v. State, 290 S.W.3d 144, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1062, 2009 WL 2144097 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).
290 S.W.3d 144 (Murray v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Care & Treatment of Purk v. State
157 S.W.3d 780 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2005)