Murray v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Murray v. State

114 N.E.2d 639, 232 Ind. 533, 1953 Ind. LEXIS 234

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 5, 1953

DocketNo. 29,108

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 114 N.E.2d 639 (Murray v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Murray v. State, 114 N.E.2d 639, 232 Ind. 533, 1953 Ind. LEXIS 234 (Ind. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The above named petitioner, appearing pro se, files an instrument entitled a petition for writ of habeas corpus. It appears to us, however, to be more in the nature of a petition for a writ to mandate the trial court to vacate, set aside and annul the judgment of conviction rendered against him in the trial court. The petition wholly fails to comply with Rule 2-35 of this court, and the issuance of a writ is therefore denied.

Note. — Reported in 114 N. E. 2d 639.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The above named petitioner, appearing pro se, files an instrument entitled a petition for writ of habeas corpus. It appears to us, however, to be more in the nature of a petition for a writ to mandate the trial court to vacate, set aside and annul the judgment of conviction rendered against him in the trial court. The petition wholly fails to comply with Rule 2-35 of this court, and the issuance of a writ is therefore denied.

Note. — Reported in 114 N. E. 2d 639.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

114 N.E.2d 639, 232 Ind. 533, 1953 Ind. LEXIS 234, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murray-v-state-ind-1953.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack