Murray v. State
114 N.E.2d 639, 232 Ind. 533, 1953 Ind. LEXIS 234
Opinion
The above named petitioner, appearing pro se, files an instrument entitled a petition for writ of habeas corpus. It appears to us, however, to be more in the nature of a petition for a writ to mandate the trial court to vacate, set aside and annul the judgment of conviction rendered against him in the trial court. The petition wholly fails to comply with Rule 2-35 of this court, and the issuance of a writ is therefore denied.
Note. — Reported in 114 N. E. 2d 639.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Murray v. State, 114 N.E.2d 639, 232 Ind. 533, 1953 Ind. LEXIS 234 (Ind. 1953).
114 N.E.2d 639 (Murray v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Yateman v. Smith
114 N.E.2d 639 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1953)