Murray v. State

110 S.E. 412, 27 Ga. App. 783, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 424
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 13, 1921
Docket12984
StatusPublished

This text of 110 S.E. 412 (Murray v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Murray v. State, 110 S.E. 412, 27 Ga. App. 783, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 424 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

There is no merit in either ground of the amendment to the motion for a new trial, and the verdict was authorized by the evidence and approved by the trial judge.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
110 S.E. 412, 27 Ga. App. 783, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 424, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murray-v-state-gactapp-1921.