Murray v. State

87 S.E. 828, 17 Ga. App. 562, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 785
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 28, 1916
Docket7055
StatusPublished

This text of 87 S.E. 828 (Murray v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Murray v. State, 87 S.E. 828, 17 Ga. App. 562, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 785 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

Opinion

Broyles, J.

1. Under tlie repeated rulings of this court and of the

Supreme Court, it is not error for the trial judge, in the absence of a timely written request, to fail to charge a theory of the defense which is supported only by the uncorroborated statement of the accused.

2. The charge was fair and sufficiently full; and the excerpts which are complained of, when construed in the light of the entire charge and of the evidence, are not erroneous.

3. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
87 S.E. 828, 17 Ga. App. 562, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 785, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murray-v-state-gactapp-1916.