Murray v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Murray v. State

186 S.E. 554, 182 Ga. 567, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 495

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided May 14, 1936·No. No. 11304·Published

Opinion

Atkinson, Justice.

On an indictment for rape a verdict was returned finding tlie defendant guilty. No complaint is made of any ruling made by the judge during the trial. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict, and there was no abuse of discretion in overruling the defendant’s motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. John D. <§ E. S. Taylor, E. D. Rivers, W. B. Mebane, for plaintiff iu error. M. J. Yeomaois, attorney-general, J. F. Kelly, solicitor-general, J. R. Rosser, B. D. Murphy, and E. J. Glower, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Atkinson, Justice.

On an indictment for rape a verdict was returned finding tlie defendant guilty. No complaint is made of any ruling made by the judge during the trial. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict, and there was no abuse of discretion in overruling the defendant’s motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. John D. <§ E. S. Taylor, E. D. Rivers, W. B. Mebane, for plaintiff iu error. M. J. Yeomaois, attorney-general, J. F. Kelly, solicitor-general, J. R. Rosser, B. D. Murphy, and E. J. Glower, contra.

Murray v. State, 186 S.E. 554, 182 Ga. 567, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 495 (Ga. 1936).

Pincite

186 S.E. 554 (Murray v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.