Murray v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Murray v. State

186 S.E. 554, 182 Ga. 567, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 495

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedMay 14, 1936

DocketNo. 11304

StatusPublished

This text of 186 S.E. 554 (Murray v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Murray v. State, 186 S.E. 554, 182 Ga. 567, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 495 (Ga. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Atkinson, Justice.

On an indictment for rape a verdict was returned finding tlie defendant guilty. No complaint is made of any ruling made by the judge during the trial. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict, and there was no abuse of discretion in overruling the defendant’s motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. John D. <§ E. S. Taylor, E. D. Rivers, W. B. Mebane, for plaintiff iu error. M. J. Yeomaois, attorney-general, J. F. Kelly, solicitor-general, J. R. Rosser, B. D. Murphy, and E. J. Glower, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Atkinson, Justice.

On an indictment for rape a verdict was returned finding tlie defendant guilty. No complaint is made of any ruling made by the judge during the trial. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict, and there was no abuse of discretion in overruling the defendant’s motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. John D. <§ E. S. Taylor, E. D. Rivers, W. B. Mebane, for plaintiff iu error. M. J. Yeomaois, attorney-general, J. F. Kelly, solicitor-general, J. R. Rosser, B. D. Murphy, and E. J. Glower, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

186 S.E. 554, 182 Ga. 567, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murray-v-state-ga-1936.