Murray v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Murray v. State

180 So. 3d 234, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 18976, 2015 WL 9264030

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 18, 2015

DocketNo. 1D15-4319

StatusPublished

This text of 180 So. 3d 234 (Murray v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Murray v. State, 180 So. 3d 234, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 18976, 2015 WL 9264030 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of appellant’s response to the Court’s order of September 22, 2015, the Court has determined , that the appeal is untimely with respect to appellant’s criminal judgment and sentence. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.. The dismissal is without prejudice to appellant filing a petition for belated appeal pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c). See Adams v. State, 734 So.2d 1086 (Fla. 1st DCA1999).

ROWE, OSTERHAUS, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of appellant’s response to the Court’s order of September 22, 2015, the Court has determined , that the appeal is untimely with respect to appellant’s criminal judgment and sentence. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.. The dismissal is without prejudice to appellant filing a petition for belated appeal pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c). See Adams v. State, 734 So.2d 1086 (Fla. 1st DCA1999).

ROWE, OSTERHAUS, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

180 So. 3d 234, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 18976, 2015 WL 9264030, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murray-v-state-fladistctapp-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack