Murray v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Murray v. State

180 So. 3d 234, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 18976, 2015 WL 9264030

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Murray v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 1620 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 18, 2015·No. No. 1D15-4319·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of appellant’s response to the Court’s order of September 22, 2015, the Court has determined , that the appeal is untimely with respect to appellant’s criminal judgment and sentence. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.. The dismissal is without prejudice to appellant filing a petition for belated appeal pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c). See Adams v. State, 734 So.2d 1086 (Fla. 1st DCA1999).

ROWE, OSTERHAUS, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of appellant’s response to the Court’s order of September 22, 2015, the Court has determined , that the appeal is untimely with respect to appellant’s criminal judgment and sentence. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.. The dismissal is without prejudice to appellant filing a petition for belated appeal pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c). See Adams v. State, 734 So.2d 1086 (Fla. 1st DCA1999).

ROWE, OSTERHAUS, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.

Murray v. State, 180 So. 3d 234, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 18976, 2015 WL 9264030 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

180 So. 3d 234 (Murray v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related