Murray v. State

444 So. 2d 83, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11499
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Murray v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 10 Fla. L. Weekly 553
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 27, 1984·No. No. 83-2373·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Lewis Murray appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The allegation that appellant was improperly denied his right to counsel at trial, if true, might entitle appellant to relief. The trial court, however, failed to conduct an evidentiary hearing or attach portions of the record which refute this allegation.

Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion and remand the case to the trial court. On remand, the trial court may either again summarily deny the motion as to the allegation and attach to its order those portions of the record which conclusively show that appellant is not entitled to relief or hold an evidentiary hearing and then rule on the ground alleged in the motion. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850; see also, Jones v. State, 421 So.2d 55 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Van Bever v. State, 405 So.2d 474 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). To obtain further review any aggrieved party must appeal the new ruling of the trial court.

REVERSED.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and SCHOONOVER, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Murray v. State, 444 So. 2d 83, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11499 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

444 So. 2d 83 (Murray v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Van Bever v. State
405 So. 2d 474 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Jones v. State
421 So. 2d 55 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)