Murray v. State

382 So. 2d 765, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 15864
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 2, 1980·No. No. 79-1839·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Section 39.111(6)(d), Florida Statutes (1979), requires that a trial court, when imposing adult sanctions on a juvenile convicted of a crime, make findings of fact and set forth reasons showing those sanctions to be in conformity with the criteria of Section 39.111(6)(c). The record here reveals that the trial judge failed to refer to all of the six criteria mentioned in that section when he sentenced appellant.

We affirm, the judgment of the trial court, but vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing pursuant to Section 39.-111(6). See Proctor v. State, 373 So.2d 450 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979); Johnson v. State, 371 So.2d 556 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979).

SCHEB, Acting C. J., and OTT and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Murray v. State, 382 So. 2d 765, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 15864 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

382 So. 2d 765 (Murray v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Christy v. State
489 So. 2d 858 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Upshaw v. State
464 So. 2d 1355 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Glenn v. State
411 So. 2d 1367 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
G. D. W. v. State
395 So. 2d 638 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
GDW v. State
395 So. 2d 638 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
State v. Johnson
382 So. 2d 765 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)