Murray v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Murray v. State

123 So. 704, 98 Fla. 211

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Murray v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 93 Fla. 706 →

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 25, 1929·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of *212 the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court • that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of *212 the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court • that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield and Buford, J. J., concur.

Murray v. State, 123 So. 704, 98 Fla. 211 (Fla. 1929).

Pincite

123 So. 704 (Murray v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.