Murray v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Murray v. State

84 So. 393, 17 Ala. App. 253, 1919 Ala. App. LEXIS 233

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 25, 1919

Docket1 Div. 328.

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 84 So. 393 (Murray v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Murray v. State, 84 So. 393, 17 Ala. App. 253, 1919 Ala. App. LEXIS 233 (Ala. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

The only errors complained of are the refusal of the court to give at the request of the defendant in writing the affirmative charges as to the several counts in the complaint, and to the action of the court in allowing the solicitor to ask the defendant, while on the witness stand, “Where were you convicted for serving liquor?”

[1] There was evidence tending to prove the allegations in the several counts of the complaint, and therefore the charges requested were properly refused.

[2] The defendant, in answer to the question, “Where were you convicted for serving liquor?” answered that he did not remember. If the question was erroneous, the answer rendered it harmless.

We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI