Murray v. Senatro

138 A.2d 709, 20 Conn. Super. Ct. 427, 20 Conn. Supp. 427, 1958 Conn. Super. LEXIS 12
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedJanuary 14, 1958
DocketFile No. 109496
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 138 A.2d 709 (Murray v. Senatro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Murray v. Senatro, 138 A.2d 709, 20 Conn. Super. Ct. 427, 20 Conn. Supp. 427, 1958 Conn. Super. LEXIS 12 (Colo. Ct. App. 1958).

Opinion

It is conceded that the plaintiff is over sixty years of age, and there is no question raised concerning any of the technical preliminaries in taking the deposition. The plaintiff seeks to restrain the taking of her deposition by the defendant simply upon the broad proposition that she is the plaintiff in the action and as such should not be compelled to expose her case through this procedure.

Section 3153d of the 1955 Supplement to the General Statutes permits either party to any civil action or probate proceeding to take the deposition of any person of the age of sixty years or over. Nearly one hundred years ago our Supreme Court established the proposition that since a party to a civil suit may call his adversary as a witness, such adverse party may be compelled to give his deposition in the same manner as any other witness. Buckingham v. Barnum,30 Conn. 358.

The motion is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Holland v. Krawski
181 A.2d 121 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
138 A.2d 709, 20 Conn. Super. Ct. 427, 20 Conn. Supp. 427, 1958 Conn. Super. LEXIS 12, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murray-v-senatro-connsuperct-1958.