Murray v. Selsky

58 A.D.3d 975, 871 N.Y.S.2d 478
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 15, 2009
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 58 A.D.3d 975 (Murray v. Selsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Murray v. Selsky, 58 A.D.3d 975, 871 N.Y.S.2d 478 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, was charged in a misbehavior report with making threats. A tier III disciplinary hearing ensued, at the conclusion of which petitioner was found guilty as charged. That determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal, prompting petitioner to commence this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking annulment.

We confirm. The determination of guilt is supported by substantial evidence consisting of the misbehavior report, related documentation and hearing testimony from the correction officer who authored the report and the inmate who petitioner threatened (see Matter of Williams v Selsky, 50 AD3d 1426, 1426-1427 [2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 703 [2008]). As for petitioner’s denial of the allegations against him, a credibility [976]*976issue was created for resolution by the Hearing Officer (see Matter of Jordan v Fischer, 53 AD3d 1013 [2008]). Petitioner’s remaining contentions, including his claims that he was improperly confined to the special housing unit, that he was denied adequate employee assistance and that the Hearing Officer was biased, have been examined and, to the extent preserved, are unavailing.

Cardona, PJ., Mercure, Rose, Kavanagh and Stein, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Moore v. Fischer
76 A.D.2d 737 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Cornwall v. Fischer
72 A.D.3d 1364 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
58 A.D.3d 975, 871 N.Y.S.2d 478, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murray-v-selsky-nyappdiv-2009.